Tuesday, April 28, 1998
Letter to the Editor: "Language"
Langley sarcasm wasn't necessary
Bryan Langley's column on March 19, "Cut one, but them all," caught my eye as a student majoring in linguistics.
Langley discussed the budget cut and the possibility of cutting the whole European Languages and Literature Department in a humorous and sarcastic way.
I would like to report our discussion of his column in a Linguistics 102 class.
Many students were concerned about the potential loss of languages which they can take at UH, pointing out the importance of foreign language learning.
One student said, "[Learning Spanish as a second language] was very difficult at first, but it broadened my way of thinking."
Another student emphasized the importance of language classes, "Learning language gives us appreciation of people who can speak that language."
One student wants to take difference languages rather than taking the same language for four semesters.
Her point is that the students could explore different languages and cultures if they could take several languages in four semesters.
This is not the main issue here, but her opinion clearly shows that students prefer having different languages to choose from at the university.
Another serious concern is about the budget cuts and the university as a whole.
Many anticipated that students would leave if the classes continue to be cut. One student said, "If the university continues to cut programs, the students will continue to leave.
Another student said, "In order to get more students, UH needs to raise the quality of education."
Students was quality of education, and cutting programs would make students leave. Losing students would make the financial situation even worse.
One student's comment summarizes this point very well: "If cuts are absolutely essential, I don't believe cutting a specific department will be best.
"I just don't understand whey the state would cut the education of its people, knowing that it's the education system that [fosters] a certain pride and appreciation for its state, which will help Hawai`i grow."
Langley successfully raised people's attention to the issue -- however, I believe his sarcasm was not particularly necessary to convey his message; students know better.
And becausae of these well-minded students, who care about the state and its future, I would like he University of Hawai`i to make an effort to maintain the quality of education even during this financially difficult time.
-Katsura [last name withheld]
linguistics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
So... my column sparked a group conversation in a linguistics class about an issue that was important to all of us, and Katsura recognized it was humorous, but just didn't like the sarcastic tone.
I thought this letter to the editor was both complimentary and humorous in its own right.
Post a Comment