
Wisconsin is a pretty tolerant place -- especially Madison -- but I think that was a mistake. As a spiritual leader, I think the Dalai Lama should be welcomed, but the Tibetan flag should not be flown. Why?
First, Buddhism doesn't have a flag. While the article claims the Dalai Lama is the spiritual and temporal leader of the Tibetan people, we are not Tibetans. For us, his presence needs to come with a distinction -- he is either a religious leader or a political one. If he is here for religious reasons, there is no reason to fly a political flag. If he is here for political reasons, he should not be welcomed at all.
The Tibetan flag has too many political connotations. As the flag of a now defunct state, a land conquered by the People's Republic of China in 1949, it is a political symbol that belongs in a museum as a relic of the past. It does not belong on top of the Wisconsin capitol building welcoming a religious leader.
Second, it's a diplomatic faux pas. The Dalai Lama is a political exile from the Chinese state, and while his presence as a religious leader would be none of their business, flying the Tibetan flag is incendiary to the Chinese government. It's as inappropriate as flying the Confederate flag over a government building for some prominent American rascist.
As an alternative, we could come up with a different flag for him, something with a Buddhist symbol that has no political connotations for the Chinese. Perhaps something ... like a Buddhist manja on it? Do you think flying a flag like this over the state capitol would be OK?
Maybe not.
No comments:
Post a Comment