Brigadier General Terence Hildner died in Afghanistan of natural causes on February 3rd, three weeks shy of his 50th birthday. As commander of the 13th Support Command, he was my general.
I'd met him only once, at the Christmas dinner in early December -- the day before he deployed.
On the 18th, I attended his memorial at Fort Hood.
At the service, COL Knowles Atchison spoke about his talks with BG Hildner, and how he'd say, "At the end of the day, it's about relationships." [Source] I've been thinking about that -- it's all about relationships. Even in the Army, with all of its rank and hierarchy, that's true.
Today he was laid to rest in Arlington National Cemetary with full military honors. [Photo Source: MSNBC]
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Monday, February 27, 2012
First sale on Amazon
Soon after returning from deployment, I got a box from the post office with a letter saying "uh ... yeah, we accidentally trashed your package -- but here's what we found."
Though they'd lost a couple of my Japanese books, they weren't anything I couldn't replace. Included among what they returned, however, was an IT book that they must have thought was mine.
After sitting on it for some time, thinking that the United States Postal Service might come looking for it (you never know), I finally made use of it -- by selling it on Amazon.com.
So thank you, post office, for bashing my box to smithereens. Your collective mistakes actually netted me a profit.
Though they'd lost a couple of my Japanese books, they weren't anything I couldn't replace. Included among what they returned, however, was an IT book that they must have thought was mine.
After sitting on it for some time, thinking that the United States Postal Service might come looking for it (you never know), I finally made use of it -- by selling it on Amazon.com.
So thank you, post office, for bashing my box to smithereens. Your collective mistakes actually netted me a profit.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
Vocabulary at 20 months-old
C's vocabulary looks like it's soon to really take off, so before I miss out on the chance, I wanted to make a list of all the words she knows right now, both English and Korean.
자지, 보도, 엄마, 애기, 아빠, 오빠, 두부, 배꼽, excuse me, please, thank you, sit, shoes, puppy, hand, piggy, binkey, hat, go, up, down, hi, bye, poop, baby, that, mommy, outside, ice cream, and owwie.
Just in the past week, she's started saying bunny, Elmo, and 아니.
자지, 보도, 엄마, 애기, 아빠, 오빠, 두부, 배꼽, excuse me, please, thank you, sit, shoes, puppy, hand, piggy, binkey, hat, go, up, down, hi, bye, poop, baby, that, mommy, outside, ice cream, and owwie.
Just in the past week, she's started saying bunny, Elmo, and 아니.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Chinese "tribe" slang
The January 28th issue of the Economist had this article about Chinese slang in it. I was curious about what the characters were, so I looked them up and confirmed them with one of my CHEMBA classmates.
Here they are, in the order in which they appear in the article:
蚁族 ant tribe
啃老族 bite the old tribe
嫁碗族 marry the bowl tribe
闪婚族 lightening marriage tribe
隐婚族 hidden marriage tribe
蜗居族 snail house tribe
奔奔族 rush rush tribe
捏捏族 crush crush tribe
房奴 mortgage slave
婚奴 marriage slave
孩子奴 slave to the only child
月光族 "spend your monthly paycheck" tribe
Here they are, in the order in which they appear in the article:
蚁族 ant tribe
啃老族 bite the old tribe
嫁碗族 marry the bowl tribe
闪婚族 lightening marriage tribe
隐婚族 hidden marriage tribe
蜗居族 snail house tribe
奔奔族 rush rush tribe
捏捏族 crush crush tribe
房奴 mortgage slave
婚奴 marriage slave
孩子奴 slave to the only child
月光族 "spend your monthly paycheck" tribe
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
"Military discount"
Friday, February 17, 2012
Door closed, but windows still open
In addition to the excitement about a new job within the Army, representatives from Cameron Brooks were in town today to talk about opportunities in the private sector. Given that I've completed my service obligation, I thought it was worth a look.
I first heard about Cameron Brooks while I was in Officer Candiate School. As a headhunting company, they focus exclusively on placing junior officers in Fortune 500 companies. I remember thinking that if things don't work out with the Army, they would be a great way to transition back into the private sector.
As it is, though, I'm not their typical demographic for a junior officer. They're looking more for someone who's only ever known ROTC or a service academy, and therefore can be developed into a future senior leader for the company. I may be a junior officer, but I don't fit that mold.
No big deal. In a sense, I'm almost relieved that it's no longer an option I have to take into consideration. As an Army captain I hope to serve in Korea or Japan, and even if I can't become a Foreign Area Officer as a major, there are still plenty of interesting assignments try for.
If nothing else, by staying in two more years I can earn entitlement to the Special Separation Bonus the Army is rolling out [look for VSI & SSB]. That's not too shabby.
I first heard about Cameron Brooks while I was in Officer Candiate School. As a headhunting company, they focus exclusively on placing junior officers in Fortune 500 companies. I remember thinking that if things don't work out with the Army, they would be a great way to transition back into the private sector.
As it is, though, I'm not their typical demographic for a junior officer. They're looking more for someone who's only ever known ROTC or a service academy, and therefore can be developed into a future senior leader for the company. I may be a junior officer, but I don't fit that mold.
No big deal. In a sense, I'm almost relieved that it's no longer an option I have to take into consideration. As an Army captain I hope to serve in Korea or Japan, and even if I can't become a Foreign Area Officer as a major, there are still plenty of interesting assignments try for.
If nothing else, by staying in two more years I can earn entitlement to the Special Separation Bonus the Army is rolling out [look for VSI & SSB]. That's not too shabby.
Old equipment, no mission
According to my company's "modified table of organization and equipment" (MTOE, an Army unit's "blueprint" of personnel and materiel), our designated mission is to haul fuel trailers.
So, now that we're about done with our post-deployment recovery, we've started drawing all our vehicles from the "Left Behind Equipment" civilian caretakers. It's been a tedious process in part because we have to test each one by pumping fuel in, then right back out, to make sure it's operational.
Along the way, I've learned a lot of things that I never realized before.
First, all our MTOE equipment is essentially useless. As we've found out during the pump tests, years of disuse have left the lines filled with sludge that contaminates the fuel so badly that it can't be used. There's a certain parts-per-million maximum that certain vehicles need, and we just can't reach that.
Second, given our current tactical needs, 90 percent of them can't be used overseas. As we've learned over the past 10 years, the IED threat requires that our trucks be uparmored, and as you can see in the first picture, these are not.
Third, we often wouldn't even be able to fill these things to capacity anyway -- anything more than a 5 percent grade puts limits on how much the truck can safely pull.
Lastly, this model of fuel trailer (the M967) is useful only for major fuel depot refueling. You know the trucks you see refilling gas stations? These do the same thing. But even on Fort Hood the Army doesn't operate a bunch of gas stations -- the only two places we go are North Fort Hood and the Brownwood National Guard training center. That's it -- and those trips were rare even during the peak deployment times.
What it CAN'T do -- and this is critical -- is refuel a vehicle by itself. A convoy of these can literally run out of gas and be unable to refill each other. They're only good for refilling those large depot fuel bladders (called "fuel farms").
These days, the Army uses uparmored versions of the M978 more than anything. They're more powerful, more versatile, and can be turned around more easily. My detachment in Tarin Kowt used one to refuel the outlying bases around Uruzgan Province.
We won't be getting any of those.
So where does that leave us? We have no mission, and with nothing to do we are essentially no more than babysitters for broken and obsolete equipment -- hardly the makings of a great evaluation.
Before and during our deployment, we used trucks that could lift containers (palletized loading systems, or PLSs), and we could do that here but for one problem: our battalion doesn't have enough M1077 flatracks to go around. It's the flatrack that everything sits on, whether its a container or pallets.
We've got tons of these M3 flatracks ("crops"), but these are useless for carrying containers. These things go *inside* the containers and are typically used to provide a removable platform for pallets of ammunition. They're not supposed to *hold* the container, they're supposed to be *held in* the container.
We could get some PLSs (no shortage of them), but we wouldn't have the proper flatracks to use them. Were we to take any, it would be taking capability away from the battalion's designated PLS company, which already has too many soldiers relative to their equipment.
Fantastic.
So here we are, back from deployment, with just about nothing to do but keep useless junk from rusting further. You can bet we're going to be the #1 go-to company in the battalion for litter clean-up details and what we in basic training so affectionately called "area beautification."
So, now that we're about done with our post-deployment recovery, we've started drawing all our vehicles from the "Left Behind Equipment" civilian caretakers. It's been a tedious process in part because we have to test each one by pumping fuel in, then right back out, to make sure it's operational.
Along the way, I've learned a lot of things that I never realized before.
First, all our MTOE equipment is essentially useless. As we've found out during the pump tests, years of disuse have left the lines filled with sludge that contaminates the fuel so badly that it can't be used. There's a certain parts-per-million maximum that certain vehicles need, and we just can't reach that.
Second, given our current tactical needs, 90 percent of them can't be used overseas. As we've learned over the past 10 years, the IED threat requires that our trucks be uparmored, and as you can see in the first picture, these are not.
Third, we often wouldn't even be able to fill these things to capacity anyway -- anything more than a 5 percent grade puts limits on how much the truck can safely pull.
Lastly, this model of fuel trailer (the M967) is useful only for major fuel depot refueling. You know the trucks you see refilling gas stations? These do the same thing. But even on Fort Hood the Army doesn't operate a bunch of gas stations -- the only two places we go are North Fort Hood and the Brownwood National Guard training center. That's it -- and those trips were rare even during the peak deployment times.
What it CAN'T do -- and this is critical -- is refuel a vehicle by itself. A convoy of these can literally run out of gas and be unable to refill each other. They're only good for refilling those large depot fuel bladders (called "fuel farms").
These days, the Army uses uparmored versions of the M978 more than anything. They're more powerful, more versatile, and can be turned around more easily. My detachment in Tarin Kowt used one to refuel the outlying bases around Uruzgan Province.
We won't be getting any of those.
So where does that leave us? We have no mission, and with nothing to do we are essentially no more than babysitters for broken and obsolete equipment -- hardly the makings of a great evaluation.
Before and during our deployment, we used trucks that could lift containers (palletized loading systems, or PLSs), and we could do that here but for one problem: our battalion doesn't have enough M1077 flatracks to go around. It's the flatrack that everything sits on, whether its a container or pallets.
We've got tons of these M3 flatracks ("crops"), but these are useless for carrying containers. These things go *inside* the containers and are typically used to provide a removable platform for pallets of ammunition. They're not supposed to *hold* the container, they're supposed to be *held in* the container.
We could get some PLSs (no shortage of them), but we wouldn't have the proper flatracks to use them. Were we to take any, it would be taking capability away from the battalion's designated PLS company, which already has too many soldiers relative to their equipment.
Fantastic.
So here we are, back from deployment, with just about nothing to do but keep useless junk from rusting further. You can bet we're going to be the #1 go-to company in the battalion for litter clean-up details and what we in basic training so affectionately called "area beautification."
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Aide, XO
Typically, a lieutenant should have a few "key developmental positions" before they're promoted to captain. According to DA PAM 600-3, a transportation officer's KD positions are platoon leader, company executive officer, detachment commander, battalion staff, installation staff, and training officer.
The battalion and higher levels of staff can wait for one's captain years, usually in the months before one's captain's career course, but it's important to get that executive officer spot during one's lieutenant years. (Having more than one captain in a company makes things a little weird.)
Having been a platoon leader for over 2.5 years, and having been passed over for the XO spot in my own company, I've been feeling pessimistic about my chances of finding another job somewhere, especially since my brigade is over strength on officers.
My mood wasn't helped on Monday when I got word that the aide position I'd interviewed for had been filled. I was one of the top three, I was told, but it went to someone else. Though that's not a complete tragedy -- it would have required two months of travel during the next year and a captain's career course date delayed until well into next year -- I was still a bit bummed.
The good news is that there's another XO spot opening up in one of my battalion's other companies soon. The current XO has 16 months experience in that role already, and is trying to get out of the battalion before it closes down later this year (in Army terms, "rolling up the guidon") due to the downsizing.
Even better, I've worked with this particular company commander before -- in Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan. His guys were the ones with the container movers (Rough Terrain Cargo Handlers, or RTCHs), the ones for whom I did the Combat Action Badge paperwork.
Pretty neat how that worked out. I don't know how much longer I have to wait for my promotion to captain, but it will be good to have some XO experience before losing eligibility for the company level assignments. Moreover, it will be nice to move over to a company with which I already have some experience.
The battalion and higher levels of staff can wait for one's captain years, usually in the months before one's captain's career course, but it's important to get that executive officer spot during one's lieutenant years. (Having more than one captain in a company makes things a little weird.)
Having been a platoon leader for over 2.5 years, and having been passed over for the XO spot in my own company, I've been feeling pessimistic about my chances of finding another job somewhere, especially since my brigade is over strength on officers.
My mood wasn't helped on Monday when I got word that the aide position I'd interviewed for had been filled. I was one of the top three, I was told, but it went to someone else. Though that's not a complete tragedy -- it would have required two months of travel during the next year and a captain's career course date delayed until well into next year -- I was still a bit bummed.
The good news is that there's another XO spot opening up in one of my battalion's other companies soon. The current XO has 16 months experience in that role already, and is trying to get out of the battalion before it closes down later this year (in Army terms, "rolling up the guidon") due to the downsizing.
Even better, I've worked with this particular company commander before -- in Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan. His guys were the ones with the container movers (Rough Terrain Cargo Handlers, or RTCHs), the ones for whom I did the Combat Action Badge paperwork.
Pretty neat how that worked out. I don't know how much longer I have to wait for my promotion to captain, but it will be good to have some XO experience before losing eligibility for the company level assignments. Moreover, it will be nice to move over to a company with which I already have some experience.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Funeral detail
Yesterday I did my first funeral detail since we came back. The deceased had been a warrant officer/helicopter pilot during the Vietnam War with 26 years of service, so it was an 8-man detail.
I'd done plenty of funeral details before the deployment, but back then I was always attached to existing details from other companies -- I typically let the staff sergeant in charge of the detail arrange everything.
This time, however, I got to exercise a bit more leadership because I was the one coordinating things.
On Friday I got the notification by phone that there was a detail packet at the brigade headquarters that I had to pick up. I got it in the afternoon just before the end of the day, so I called the Casualty Assistance Office and arranged to pick up the bugle on Saturday morning.
During the CAO appointment, I also confirmed the pertinent details, such as the time and location of the funeral. I then called the staff sergeant and put him in charge of picking up the weapons, the blank ammunition, and picking up the government van.
Things went smoothly, and we left on Monday morning at about 0730. The drive was about two and a half hours, putting us as the funeral home about two hours before the service.
My crew was a bit nervous because they hadn't practiced with blanks beforehand, but the volleys went well. The best praise was from the servicemember's widow, "[He] would have loved to have seen this."
We finished at about 2:00, and went out to eat at Texas Land & Cattle. Our per diem allowance amounted to about $53 per person after tax and tip, so I told everyone to get appetizers and desserts if they wanted. Even so, we didn't even come close to maxing out our allowance. I was so full I didn't even eat dinner that night.
Funeral details can be a bit stressful -- there are no "redo's" -- but the compensation (day off of work and a hearty meal) is always worth it.
Monday, February 06, 2012
Company changes, interview
My company's gone through a lot of changes in the past month. With our newest MTOE we shrank from three line platoons to two (losing us all our cooks in the process). This past week, the company command team switched out for the first time in three years. (The XO, who made captain during the summer, already left early last month.)
I have no idea why "they" (whoever "they" are) let the same commander stay for that long, but it might have to do with the way we never stayed under the same battalion for more than six months or so. I'll probably never know, but the new commander said the deciding people have set a new maximum of 18 months. (To be "branch-qualified," you only need one year of command time, and with the Army downsizing there will be no shortage of people eager for their turn.)
I might be the next to leave, but I have no idea. I interviewed for a position as an aide today, but I was one of 14 candidates for the position. The process itself went well -- I showed up on time, looked nice (wore contacts), and presented my strengths in coherent fashion -- but there's no telling what other candidates are like or what chances I have.
I'll find out later this week if that goes through, but -- more than likely -- only if I don't get the call.
I have no idea why "they" (whoever "they" are) let the same commander stay for that long, but it might have to do with the way we never stayed under the same battalion for more than six months or so. I'll probably never know, but the new commander said the deciding people have set a new maximum of 18 months. (To be "branch-qualified," you only need one year of command time, and with the Army downsizing there will be no shortage of people eager for their turn.)
I might be the next to leave, but I have no idea. I interviewed for a position as an aide today, but I was one of 14 candidates for the position. The process itself went well -- I showed up on time, looked nice (wore contacts), and presented my strengths in coherent fashion -- but there's no telling what other candidates are like or what chances I have.
I'll find out later this week if that goes through, but -- more than likely -- only if I don't get the call.
Sunday, February 05, 2012
Installing a CAC reader
Military ID cards (CACs, or Common Access Cards) come with a smart card chip in them so that we can log in to work computers securely. It's pretty cool stuff.
One problem, though, is that it makes logging in from home a pain, and the only computers the company's had to work with are the ones in the headquarters office. The line platoons have been out of luck.
Though websites like MyPay, AKO email, and the Human Resource Center allow you to log in with a username and password, the Army is moving toward more secure systems. Even now, you can't sign annual evaluations without a CAC, and word is that the username option will disappear for AKO.
So, with the help of www.militarycac.com, I installed my very own CAC reader.
Though I can't access the Exchange server, I can at least get something done during my lunch break. How ironic that I'm currently the most productive when I'm not actually working.
One problem, though, is that it makes logging in from home a pain, and the only computers the company's had to work with are the ones in the headquarters office. The line platoons have been out of luck.
Though websites like MyPay, AKO email, and the Human Resource Center allow you to log in with a username and password, the Army is moving toward more secure systems. Even now, you can't sign annual evaluations without a CAC, and word is that the username option will disappear for AKO.
So, with the help of www.militarycac.com, I installed my very own CAC reader.
Though I can't access the Exchange server, I can at least get something done during my lunch break. How ironic that I'm currently the most productive when I'm not actually working.
Saturday, February 04, 2012
FSWE/FSOT #8?
I took the Foreign Service Officer Test (FSOT) for the umpteenth time today. I think I did OK, but I don't feel as confident about the essay section as I do on the other sections. And I know I missed one question in the job knowledge section about the 1960s.
With my service obligation having ended on December 4, I'd hoped to take it the last two times it was offered, but with the deployment I guess the Army had other plans for me. I'd missed the June test by just a few days and the October test by a month. It's not too big a deal, though. If things work out, I'll at least have enough time as a captain to influence a salary offering (I think).
The last time I took an FSOT was 2006. Hopefully, this candidacy will go better.
With my service obligation having ended on December 4, I'd hoped to take it the last two times it was offered, but with the deployment I guess the Army had other plans for me. I'd missed the June test by just a few days and the October test by a month. It's not too big a deal, though. If things work out, I'll at least have enough time as a captain to influence a salary offering (I think).
The last time I took an FSOT was 2006. Hopefully, this candidacy will go better.
From bulwark to model
Ma Ying-jeou won reelection as president of Taiwan this past month; in a broader sense, his win was a great victory for notion of Chinese democracy.
What makes Taiwan's election even more interesting was the impact it had on mainland China. China's Twitter-like wēibó (微博) covered the event extensively, and with such zeal that the official censors just couldn't keep up.
How ironic, then, that we should have a bigger stake in supporting Taiwan now that we did before 1989. Before the 1990s, Taiwan (like South Korea) was an autocratic regime. The KMT Party (國民黨, Kuomintang) dominated the political landscape in the same fashion as most other Cold War-era Western-supported dictatorships.
Back then, in the words of Douglas MacArthur, Taiwan served as "an unsinkable aircraft carrier" in the fight against communism. Now, it serves a new role: the model of democracy for a burgeoning Chinese awareness about multi-party elections.
If Taiwan is to China like West Germany was to the East before unification, we owe it our unwavering support -- not so much as a military ally, but as a partner in exposing the Communist Party's lie that "democracy begets chaos."
What makes Taiwan's election even more interesting was the impact it had on mainland China. China's Twitter-like wēibó (微博) covered the event extensively, and with such zeal that the official censors just couldn't keep up.
How ironic, then, that we should have a bigger stake in supporting Taiwan now that we did before 1989. Before the 1990s, Taiwan (like South Korea) was an autocratic regime. The KMT Party (國民黨, Kuomintang) dominated the political landscape in the same fashion as most other Cold War-era Western-supported dictatorships.
Back then, in the words of Douglas MacArthur, Taiwan served as "an unsinkable aircraft carrier" in the fight against communism. Now, it serves a new role: the model of democracy for a burgeoning Chinese awareness about multi-party elections.
If Taiwan is to China like West Germany was to the East before unification, we owe it our unwavering support -- not so much as a military ally, but as a partner in exposing the Communist Party's lie that "democracy begets chaos."
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
Games world leaders play
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)